Consistency and adaptivity are complementary targets for the validation of variance-based uncertainty quantification metrics in machine learning regression tasks - Université Paris-Saclay Accéder directement au contenu
Pré-Publication, Document De Travail Année : 2023

Consistency and adaptivity are complementary targets for the validation of variance-based uncertainty quantification metrics in machine learning regression tasks

Pascal Pernot

Résumé

Reliable uncertainty quantification (UQ) in machine learning (ML) regression tasks is becoming the focus of many studies in materials and chemical science. It is now well understood that average calibration is insufficient, and most studies implement additional methods testing the conditional calibration with respect to uncertainty, i.e. consistency. Consistency is assessed mostly by so-called reliability diagrams. There exists however another way beyond average calibration, which is conditional calibration with respect to input features, i.e. adaptivity. In practice, adaptivity is the main concern of the final users of a ML-UQ method, seeking for the reliability of predictions and uncertainties for any point in features space. This article aims to show that consistency and adaptivity are complementary validation targets, and that a good consistency does not imply a good adaptivity. Adapted validation methods are proposed and illustrated on a representative example.

Dates et versions

hal-04234507 , version 1 (10-10-2023)

Identifiants

Citer

Pascal Pernot. Consistency and adaptivity are complementary targets for the validation of variance-based uncertainty quantification metrics in machine learning regression tasks. 2023. ⟨hal-04234507⟩
15 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More